What is CML ?  
CML Overview  
Managing CML  
Resources  
Receive Information
Advertisement

Lymphoma Lymphoma Treatment NHL Treatment

How To Choose the Best Treatment Option When Indolent NHL Returns


Watch Video

Summary & Participants

Learn how patients with indolent or slow-growing non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma should go about picking the best treatment for themselves.

Medically Reviewed On: November 28, 2006

Webcast Transcript


JOHN LEONARD, MD: Hello, I'm Dr. John Leonard. I'm the Clinical Director of the Cornell Center for Lymphoma and Myeloma. We're going to talk today about how a patient with indolent or slow-growing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma decides among treatment options when the disease returns or relapses.

Joining me today is my Cornell colleague, Dr. Morton Coleman. Dr. Coleman is a clinical professor of medicine at the Weil Medical College of Cornell University. Also joining me is Dr. Owen O'Connor. He's an oncologist with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Let's start today with a brief review of the treatment options. Patients with indolent lymphoma, which is about a third of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma overall, often have disease that off -- that can recur. And there are a whole array of treatment options, and it can be very complicated, choosing between chemotherapy, rituximab, radioactive antibodies like Zevalin and Bexxar, stem cell transplant

Dr. Coleman, you've seen over the years kind of the major impact that rituximab has made in these diseases, and traditionally patients were treated with chemotherapy. Now we use rituximab with chemotherapy. Now there's a whole group of patients that are getting treated with rituximab alone. So what sorts of patients do you see as appropriate for just treatment with rituximab alone, and how do you like to give it in that sort of scenario?

MORTON COLEMAN, MD: Patients really tolerate Rituxan remarkably well. One of the particularly good properties of Rituxan is that it does not impact bone marrow function, and sometimes we can just get away, or get by, if you would, with using Rituxan by itself. It's simple. You take it once a week for four weeks, and it's given in the office, and thereafter there's very little to contend with.

The big debate now in medical circles is whether patients who respond to Rituxan -- those patients in particular who have just slowly progressive disease -- whether these patients should be maintained with Rituxan or not. I think the current trend is tilting toward maintaining these patients, although the jury is still out.

JOHN LEONARD, MD: And so the advantages, Dr. O'Connor, of maintenance rituximab in your view, obviously, the patient has to come back to get more treatment. What's the tradeoff there? Are there downsides in your experience as far as the convenience of it? Do you think it works well? What about side effects?

Page 1 of 11 Next Page >>

About CMLhelp.orgPrivacy PolicyDisclaimer
Editorial & Sponsorship PolicyFaculty